Search for: "Case, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
The judge ruled for both the claim of the Plaintiff and the counterclaim of the Defendant and denied any damages to either party. _______________________________________________________ In another June 2023 decision in Munoz v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
Insurance Law Forum Non Conveniens Statute of Limitations (In the Foreign Forum) Return-Jurisdiction Clause Lloyd’s    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CV-3585   Plaintiff-appellant Noble House, L.L.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Pennsylvania is a comparative negligence state so contributory negligence by the plaintiffs would not be a bar to recovery. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:49 pm
Defendant-appellant FCA US LLC invoked the first sale doctrine as a defense to trademark claims asserted against it by plaintiff-appellee Bluetooth SIG Inc. [read post]
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
The Commission’s reversion order did not interfere with the plaintiff’s reasonable investment backed expectations at the time of acquisition because the plaintiff had committed to build 385 housing units and had failed to complete them. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
Any arbitration shall be conducted in Harris County, Texas, United States of America in the English language. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Wolfgang Demino
The very same Judge Posner who just happened to write a book (actually serveral) on the plight of pro-se litigants, after stepping down from the federal bench, not to mention having opened a center which he callsPosner Center for Justice for ProSes Hopefully, one day Discover Bank will discover whose aid it sought in its unworthy effort to suppress an appeal on the merits by an out-of-luck defendant who couldn't afford a lawyer.Here is the Dallas COA's diagnosis of how pro-se… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm by MOTP
Plaintiff-Appellant Vicky Forby ("Forby") appeals the district court's grant of Defendant-Appellee One Technologies, L.P.'s ("One Tech") motion to compel arbitration. [read post]