Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 1 - 20 of 8,528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 7:36 am by Imke Ratschko
Another day, another Merchant Cash Advance Lender goes to court and asks for a summary judgment based on the alleged breach of its Merchant Cash Advance agreement  (aka Revenue Purchase agreement) (MCA Servicing Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division, EEOC v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
App. 342, 348 (2002); and Testimony from a law enforcement officer during the State’s case-in-chief that the defendant did not say anything when he was arrested and did not explain why he had such a large amount of cash, State v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Problems With Cash Repurchases Payment with cash may be somewhat simpler than payment with a note, but the portfolio company may not have sufficient cash on hand and, even if it does, that cash may be subject to legal and/or contractual restrictions (such as debt covenants) that preclude its use. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:27 pm by Jon Katz
If you have substantial cash with you when arrested for alleged drug trafficking, that substantial cash may be used as evidence that you were trafficking and not simply using, and may be seized in asset forfeiture proceedings (and the Supreme Court in Culley v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
Defendant: Look, sure, I was just convicted of drug trafficking, and, yes, I testified that I deposited all my legitimate income in the bank while I kept all my drug-trafficking money in cash, and, okay, you found a bunch of cash in my house near my drugs and my scale and my notebooks meticulously documenting my drug-trafficking transactions, but that doesn't prove the cash is the proceeds of drug trafficking. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:30 am by Adam N. Steinman
It seems like only yesterday that I posted a Jot about standing, and the Court has not let up—with more big decisions (like Murthy v. [read post]
Anteau, “The Northern District of Illinois v. the Internet: How Chicago Became the Center of Schedule A Trademark Infringement Litigation”; Law.Com, December 19, 2023. [read post]
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:16 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Moreover, under common law, a controlling shareholder in a cash-out merger owes the minority shareholders the default fiduciary duties of loyalty and due care, and courts apply an exacting standard of judicial review known as “entire fairness” (Schultz v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]