Search for: "Castor v. Castor"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
As Castor observed, “A high crime is a felony, and a misdemeanour is a misdemeanour. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Or so said the Texas Court of Appeals (Amarillo) in Boes v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:27 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
We can’t revive expired criminal SOLs, according to the Supreme Court in Stogner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:38 am
See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
They were on their own.Ants v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 12:20 pm
” (citation omitted)).[11] Castor Petroleum, 968 N.Y.S. 2d at 498.[12] Stroud, 2004 WL 1087373, at *5 (emphasis added).[13] Id. at *7.[14] Kolodin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:16 am
The United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion on misclassification of workers in the case of Priya Verma v. 3001 Castor, Inc., which found that adult dancers were employees entitled to the protection of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:30 am
Author David Castor Licence CCO 1.0 Source Wikipedia Royal Courts of Justice Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Lewison, Floyd and Hamblin) Addlesee and others v Dentons Europe LLP [2019] EWCA Civ 1600 (2 Oct 2019) This was an appeal against Master Clark's refusal to order disclosure of certain documents on the grounds that they were privileged. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
Most recently, the United States Court of Appeals considered the case of Verma v. 3001 Castor, Inc., d/b/a The Penthouse Club and/or The Penthouse Club@Philly, Case No. 18-2462 (3d Cir. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:03 am
Royal Courts of Justice Author David Castor Reproduced pursuant to CCO 1.0 Source Wikipedia Royal Courts of Justice Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Recorder Campbell QC) NXP BV v ID Management Systems [2019] EWHC 1902 (IPEC) (31 July 2019) This was an action for trade mark infringement. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:29 pm
This case, Alerding Castor Hewitt, LLP v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:06 am
OVG Berlin-Brandenburg, Beschl. v. 21. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:24 am
., et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am
As can be seen in the data presented in tables V and VI, different vehicles were acceptable for 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and for estradiol valerate. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:28 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:26 pm
The first of which is Moen Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:47 am
The Container Store v. [read post]
