Search for: "Catt v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
R v Sarah Louise Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187. (27 September 2012). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 5:28 am
However, the Indiana Court of Appeals (reluctantly so) relied on Indiana Supreme Court precedent in Catt v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
County (2013) and NFIB v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
In particular, the court considered the deemed lawful taking of photographs by police officers as in R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 and R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] AC 1065. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
In the linked cases of R (on the application of Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case [2015] UKSC 9 (Case Comment here), the Court was asked to consider whether the retention of records by the police relating to acts that occurred in public (in these cases, protesting and an argument with a neighbour) could be contrary to the right to privacy. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
[See also Lord Sumption’s opinion in Catt & T of 4 March 2015 for an assessment of the same act]. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Such a matter was recently considered by the UK Supreme Court in R (Catt and T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 9. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008),… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
In the case of Mr Catt, the Supreme Court found, inter alia, that the interference with Mr Catt’s private life had been minor. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:10 pm
Perhaps by further legal clarification he is referring to the Supreme Court’s impending judgment in the Catt v ACPO case? [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
