Search for: "Catt v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
R v Sarah Louise Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187. (27 September 2012). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am by INFORRM
In particular, the court considered the deemed lawful taking of photographs by police officers as in R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 and R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] AC 1065. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
  In the linked cases of R (on the application of Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case [2015] UKSC 9 (Case Comment here), the Court was asked to consider whether the retention of records by the police relating to acts that occurred in public (in these cases, protesting and an argument with a neighbour) could be contrary to the right to privacy. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
[See also Lord Sumption’s opinion in Catt & T of 4 March 2015 for an assessment of the same act]. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am by Andrew Wheelhouse, OXHRH
Such a matter was recently considered by the UK Supreme Court in R (Catt and T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 9. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm by Jag
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008),… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the case of Mr Catt, the Supreme Court found, inter alia, that the interference with Mr Catt’s private life had been minor. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:10 pm by Jag
 Perhaps by further legal clarification he is referring to the Supreme Court’s impending judgment in the Catt v ACPO case? [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case, heard 2-4 December 2014. [read post]