Search for: "Cave v. Cave"
Results 1 - 20
of 725
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:43 am
Young v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
Emma Cave In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) the UK House of Lords held that minors under the age of 16 could access contraceptive advice and treatment in their own right provided they satisfied a test which became known as “Gillick competence. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:10 pm
Mckesson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives) in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:14 am
That is false; often, the platforms just caved to the government without changing those terms. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit”: Frank Thorp V, Sahil Kapur, and Kate Santaliz of NBC News have this report. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
As such, they should not face the difficulties and – bluntly put – resistance that, instead, they have been encountering across multiple national courts.The recent and somewhat ‘twin’ decisions of the Rome Court of First Instance in RTI v Vimeo (decision 5700/2023) and RTI v V Kontakte (decision 14531/2023) are examples of both a misunderstanding and misapplication of CJEU case law, notably the 2021 judgment in YouTube, C-682/18 and C-683/18 [IPKat… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:04 am
Hunter is pursuing the arguments from Bruen v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:27 pm
I remain persuaded by Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Don't unilaterally cave. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Pereira v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 12:51 pm
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Anniversary Edition My favorite way to play this game is role-playing as an alchemist—spending an hour or two in the evenings building a cottage near a scenic lake, exploring lush forests and caves for ingredients, and making potions as a bard plays a lute in the background. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
All too often, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:58 pm
But even before Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
. 'The normal meaning of securities is not open to doubt'; Viscount Cave in Singer v Williams (1920). [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:31 am
In Texas v. [read post]