Search for: "Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Forest Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
The Center for Biological Diversity described the waiver as a “horrific step backwards” for conservation efforts in the region. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
(Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Court Jurisdiction) Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
Lyman County (Voting Rights; Redistricting) Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Part 3—Funding the Internal Revenue Service and Improving Taxpayer Compliance Sec. 10301—Enhancement of Internal Revenue Service Resources: This section provides $80 billion in funding to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), including more than $3 billion for taxpayer services, more than $45 billion for enforcement activities, more than $25 billion for operations support, and more than $4 billion for maintaining and… [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
/California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
Key Results and Observations Predictive Coding Technology and Protocol Survey Responder Overview (Chart 1) 47.62% of responders were from law firms. 28.57% of responders were from software or services provider organizations. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 4:43 pm
Key Results and Observations Predictive Coding Technology and Protocol Survey Responder Overview (Chart 1) 50.77% of responders were from software or services provider organizations. 27.69% of responders were from law firms. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Key Results and Observations Predictive Coding Technology and Protocol Survey Responder Overview (Chart 1) 43.53% of responders were from law firms. 35.29% of responders were from software or services provider organizations. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE City of Oakland v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:52 pm
Predictive Coding Technology and Protocol Survey Responder Overview (Chart 6) 41.27% of responders were from law firms. 38.10% of responders were from software or services provider organizations. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
From Platforms to Workflows: Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey – Fall 2019 Results
5 Sep 2019, 2:42 pm
Predictive Coding Technology and Protocol Survey Responder Overview (Chart 6) 39% of responders were from law firms. 37% of responders were from software or services provider organizations. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am
United Site Services provided al…Read More » Arizona Petting Zoo 2005 Organism: E. coli O157:H7 Vehicle: Animal Contact Two children were hospitalized due to infections with an identical strain of E.coli O157:H7. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
Predictive Coding Technology and Protocol Survey Responder Overview (Chart 6) 50% of responders are from software or services provider organizations. 35% of responders are from law firms. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. [read post]
