Search for: "Central Maine Power v. MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Some states such as New Jersey applied the discovery rule in cases related to this issue, while others, for example New York, utilized the demand and refusal rule. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP is at its most powerful and potentially useful not as a direct manifestation of state power through law, but by embracing methods of regulatory governance that enhance the use of market levers to manage preferred behaviors. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
This level of concentrated power over a central means of communication has an outsized impact on public discourse and political debate in this country. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
In exchange for disclosing the details of the invention to the public, the government grants the inventor the exclusive right to make, use, and sell their invention. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Altumatim leverages the power of the latest in AI and computer technologies to provide results that others simply cannot provide. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
California – Judge Finds Eastman Culpable for Ethics Breaches in 2020 Bid to Keep Trump in Power MSN &nd [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
China calls on the international community to act on true multilateralism, uphold the international system with the United Nations at its core, support the U.N. in playing a central role in international affairs, further develop and improve the global governance system, and jointly build a community with a shared future for mankind.I.Enhancing global security governance and safeguarding world peace and stabilitySecurity is humanity’s most basic need and the most important global… [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In general, the main proposals are based on long-discredited approaches to public control of competitive markets—micromanagement of specific practices such as “self-preferencing,” product “bundling,” or competing with customers. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
The following articles in the zero draft, released in June, are the focus of our main concerns about Chapter V, which deals with cross border surveillance and the extent to which Member States must assist each other and collaborate in surveillance on each other's behalf. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Earlier in the summer, protests swept Senegal as President Macky Sall sought an unconstitutional third term and jailed the main opposition candidate on dubious charges. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
The U.S. federal banking regulators have sought public comment on the proposed principles and have indicated their intention to work with each other to promote consistency in this area through final interagency guidance. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:23 pm
Permissionless (public) blockchains are publicly available and fully decentralized DLTs, which means there is no central authority involved. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm
And, this second is to show that “this democratic antimonopoly moment,” in conjunction with expanded police powers and public utility law (covered in earlier chapters), “generated a template for a modern law of regulated industries” [184]. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am
It was aimed at forcing automakers to put more effort into building safer cars for the public. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
The main issue is to help save Ukraine. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court recently ruled that courts must take separation of powers concerns into account when members of Congress want personal information from the president. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Examples of overt disruption: Stewart v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:35 am
In the other decision, the court held that the government could not force a public utility to include the view of a third party with which the utility did not agree in the same mailing envelope that the utility routinely used to communicate with its customers its opinions on matters of public concern. [read post]
