Search for: "Childs v. Clements"
Results 1 - 20
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
”[4] The current ontologies of the human-A.I. relationship does not move far from this starting (and end) point.[5] In Alice Walker’s book, The Color Purple,[6] one gets a taste for this in the relationship between Sofia and her ‘mistress’, Miss Millie, who Sofia detests, but who treats her as a human extension of herself—an adult and animated version of the dolls she played with as a child. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] N.J. Appellate Court Affirms Family Court Judge's Refusal to Order COVID Vaccination
29 Apr 2023, 10:59 am
From Scott v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And Paul Clement, now of the boutique firm Clement & Murphy, is seated at the second case counsel table to await argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 11:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:40 pm
” Anonymous v Anonymous The January 2016 decision made in Gottlieb v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
” The juvenile court failed to take into account that the child had also recently been molested by an older child, and that “[h]er repeated statements about abuse were strikingly similar to descriptions of that” incident. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:04 am
Gyger v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
" Mooppan cited Pena–Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
Here, Clemente Pereida’s state misdemeanor conviction prevented him from even asking an immigration judge to consider the hardship that his deportation would have on his child, who is a U.S. citizen. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
This falls far short of meeting the “but for” test for causation (Clements v Clements, [2012] 2 SCR 181, 2012 SCC 32 (CanLII)). [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am
Clements. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
Conversely, women sometimes regret the decision to have the child, as did a number of those who surrendered their babies in the era before Roe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:57 am
This is a logical extension of the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:57 am
This is a logical extension of the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]