Search for: "Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 6:52 am
The Court in its 1978 decision Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
The Court’s 1978 decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:32 am
Citing the longstanding case of Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
The Eighth Circuit also held that CRST could not satisfy the standard of Christianburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
(quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 1:50 pm
” The Eighth Circuit also held that CRST could not satisfy the standard of Christianburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
The statute makes no distinction between the standard for prevailing plaintiffs versus prevailing defendants, but in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
However, an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing defendant is appropriate in much more limited circumstances.In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:24 pm
In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
Supreme Court entitled Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:40 pm
First, CRST argued that the Eighth Circuit’s rule that a prevailing defendant may recover fees only when a case is decided “on the merits” has no basis in the statute, conflicts with Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:25 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:14 am
" Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 1:10 pm
It had long been argued by attorneys representing employees in these types of cases that Section 218.5 should be interpreted to mean that a prevailing employer would only be entitled to its fees if the employee’s suit was found to be frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation – a standard announced in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:10 pm
The Court noted that Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:02 am
Supreme Court's decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
Dept. of Housing & Urban Dev., 717 F.2d 929, 931 (4th Cir. 1983) (quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
