Search for: "Christopher S. Yoo"
Results 1 - 20
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 5:26 am
In a recent essay published in the Northwestern University Law Review, Christopher S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
Professor Ilya Somin recently wrote a post agreeing with Professor Christopher Yoo who argues that simply labelling a firm a "common carrier" "plays no significant role in the constitutional analysis" and that common carrier laws for social media violate the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:24 pm
I agree with almost all of Yoo's analysis. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
What does Florida’s law actually say? [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 11:17 am
“common carrier regulation of social media platforms is not only unconstitutional, but also a terrible idea as a matter of public policy” – Christopher Yoo, What’s In a Name? [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:04 pm
In their comments to the FCC, Gus Hurwitz and Christopher Yoo conclude that the FCC itself seems to think that Title II regulation is a major question of “economic and political significance”: Rather, the fact that an agency feels it is necessary to ask whether its decisions raise major questions suggests that those questions may well be major. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:00 pm
CHristopher S. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
And outside participants included still-familiar names, like Christopher Yoo, Tim Wu, and Gigi Sohn. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:03 pm
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now nearly three years old, has published 65 articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), Keith Whittington (Princeton, moving to Yale) (forthcoming), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent research paper, Christopher S. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Christopher S. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
Christopher S. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
So let's do that now. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 10:24 am
So far we've published articles by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging scholars. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now two years old, has published over fifty articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming within a week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
For example, Christopher Yoo and Joseph Fishman have justified the derivative works right on similar grounds, highlighting the benefits of exclusion for exclusion's sake. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:55 am
Christopher Yoo, University of Pennsylvania Law School: Jonathan Baker favors enforcement. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
It has published dozens of articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming within a week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now two years old, has published dozens of articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming within a week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:52 am
Dec. 22, 2022): the question boils down to whether ActiveProspect was an independent third party hired to eavesdrop on What If’s communications, or whether ActiveProspect’s software was merely a tool that What If used to record its own communications with plaintiff. [read post]
