Search for: "Chrysler Corp. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2023, 11:17 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Chrysler Corp., 379 Ill.App.3d 162, 179 (2nd Dist. 2008) ($59,695.79 punitive damage award for dealer misrepresenting vehicle as having “Quadra–Trac on-demand-four-wheel-drive system”, where plaintiff obtained $8,500 in actual damages); Totz v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:35 pm by John Coyle
  At a minimum, however, the Myhra decision is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s admonition in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Cullen ed. 1984) (quoted in Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Acknowledging that the FDCA does not contain a private right of action, the district court relied on Chrysler Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:16 am by Daniel Hemel
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in a 1973 case, In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp., involving the bankruptcy of the Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth car dealer. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm by Daniel Hemel
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit announced it in the 1973 case In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:12 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Chrysler Corp., 150 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 1998), which has guided lower courts on settlement approval and did not require a conflict-of-law test to satisfy predominance. [read post]