Search for: "Cities Service Company v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
United States, meaning that the court will be making yet another foray into the “categorical approach” to determining whether prior convictions are “crimes of violence” for sentencing purposes. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
For its part, the NRA contended that it was simply the sponsor of Carry Guard, while Lockton was the producer (indeed, it was Lockton Affinity—the company’s unit devoted to affinity insurance—that managed the program). [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
More than a dozen1 suits are pending across the United States in which copyright owners are pursuing various theories of infringement against AI platforms, alleging that AI models either infringe their copyrights because they are trained using copyrighted works,2 or because the output of the AI models itself infringes,3 or both. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
” Chat GPT interprets privacy concerns on social media SpainTelecommunications Services Conglomerate v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
This delay was largely influenced by the interests of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) and other asbestos mining and product manufacturing companies. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Freed’s conduct could be attributed to the State only if he was “possessed of state authority” to post city updates and register citizen concerns. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]