Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. County of Kern" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
City of Los Angeles (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 657 In 2010, the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP”), and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Board of Commissioners (collectively, “Los Angeles”) approved a set of substantively identical leases (2010 Leases) governing about 6,100 acres of land Los Angeles owns… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 368, and my 4/9/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
Kern County Fire Department responded with a Hazmat team, as did Kern County Public Health Services. [read post]
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Kern County Board of Supervisors (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 708, also addressed important CEQA baseline and railroad operation preemption issues. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]