Search for: "City of Providence v. First National Stores, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The First District Court of Appeal subsequently reaffirmed the list of factors for compensable workplace accidents arising out of violence in Carnegie v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
A store has no First Amendment right to refuse to sell to Catholics, even if it describes this as a boycott of people who provide support for the Catholic Church. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
Onions were distributed to wholesalers, restaurants, and retail stores in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Mischon de Reya has a blog post analysing the implications of the first civil claim for sexual “image-based abuse” in the recently decided case of FGX v Stuart Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB). [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 7 March 2023, the High Court of Australia revoked Facebook Inc’s special leave to appeal to the High Court in the case of Facebook Inc v Australian Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] HCATrans 22. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
”[13] The National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) and the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) also provide a framework for review of federal actions which may impact the environment. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am by Aaron L. Nielson
On the date of her first fall she had gone into the defendant’s store to do some Christmas shopping. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Andrew Koppelman
Pennsylvania: If we were required to exercise our own judgment on the question whether the Government has an obligation to provide free contraceptives to all women, we would have to take sides in the great national debate about whether the Government should provide free and comprehensive medical care for all. [read post]