Search for: "City of Westminster v. District Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
The Court of Appeal held, following Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (2015) UKSC 22 (our note), and Abdikadir v Ealing LBC (2022) EWCA Civ 979,(our note): i) Even if Ms M did not qualify for ‘zone 1’ (in borough) accommodation under Ealing’s policy, the council should have tried to secure accommodation as nearby as possible; ii) the onus was on the council to show compliance with s.208(1) where raised,. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
Hodge v Folkestone and Hythe District Council (2023) EWCA Civ 896 A second appeal to the Court of Appeal on Folkestone’s decision that Ms Hodge as intentionally homeless because she had left a room in a hostel run by a charity that she was occupying under licence. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
” The City of Westminster would also provide alcohol-treatment services to Bafna-Louis. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
And then, on whether Waltham had implemented its own policy, the Court of Appeal found this situation was more akin to Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing (2022) EWCA Civ 979 (our note) than Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster (2018) EWCA Civ 2742, in that the issue was a lack of evience in following the policy, rather the terms of the policy itself. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am
Westminster’s argument, the High Court found, had already been rejected in R (Alemi) v Westminster City Council (2015) EWHC 1765 (Admin) (our note). [read post]
Case Preview: Protect Rural England (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
27 Jan 2021, 2:30 am
The principles set out in Bolton Metropolitan District Council and others v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
That can be seen from, for example, the decision of the House of Lords in Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2001) UKHL 57, (2002) 1 AC 547 and, more recently, that of the Court of Appeal in Waltham Forest London Borough Council v Saleh. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) 1 AC 547, Omar v Westminster City Council (2008) HLR 36 (our report), Abed v City of Westminster (2011) EWCA Civ 1406 (our report), and Temur v Hackney LBC (2014) HLR 39 (our report) had all variously held that the facts relevant at review were those that pertained at the date of the review, not at the date of the original decision. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
On Monday 17 December, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council & Anor. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council & Anor, heard 6 Nov 2018. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council & Anor, heard 6 Nov 2018. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am
Following Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) HLR 1, the Circuit Judge found that it was. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:19 pm
The Court of Appeals deferred to the trial court’s factual finding, citing City & County of Denver v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:11 pm
The Court of Appeals deferred to the trial court’s factual finding, citing City & County of Denver v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 1:54 pm
Assured Property Service Ltd v Ooo, County Court at Edmonton, 30 June 2017 Ms Ooo was an assured shorthold tenant of APS with a post 1 October 2015 tenancy. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
There are some paragraphs of a general nature on a local authority’s responsibilities when considering or arranging out of borough (or more distant) temporary accommodation, drawing on the Supreme Court judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22 (our report). [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
On Thursday 11 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am
A grant of immunity would require approval from two-thirds of the congressional committee requesting testimony or a majority vote in the full House or Senate, as well as the approval of a district court judge. [read post]
