Search for: "Clark v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 2,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
The Excalibur Litigation resulted in a written judgment (“the Excalibur Judgment” and, along with the Transcript, the “Excalibur Material”) delivered by Christopher Clarke LJ dated 13 December 2013 ([2013] EWHC 2767) [8]. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
While "some overlap between the three separate branches does not violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers[,] . . . when [a branch] acts inconsistently with [the powers of another], or usurps its prerogatives, . . . the doctrine of separation is violated" (Clark v Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 189 [1985]).Defendant consists of 11 members who are nominated, subject to certain eligibility restrictions, by various members of the executive and legislative… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
While "some overlap between the three separate branches does not violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers[,] . . . when [a branch] acts inconsistently with [the powers of another], or usurps its prerogatives, . . . the doctrine of separation is violated" (Clark v Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 189 [1985]).Defendant consists of 11 members who are nominated, subject to certain eligibility restrictions, by various members of the executive and legislative… [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
Although some protestors may argue that camping is protected symbolic expression, a Supreme Court decision from 1982, Clark v. [read post]
(For discussion of why “shouting down,” even though expressive, is not protected from government prohibition, see this recent column by one of us.)Calling physical blockage peaceful because it does not involve overt and affirmative violent assaults on third parties does nothing to alter its lack of constitutional status. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]