Search for: "Clark v. SS" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am by CMS
The references, made under s 33(1) of the Scotland Act 1998, required the court to determine whether certain provisions in each of the Bills (namely ss 6, 19(2)(a)(ii), 20(10)(a)(ii) and 21(5)(b)(ii) of the UNCRC Bill and ss 4(1A) and 5(1) of the ECLSG Bill) were within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am by CMS
In this post, Joanna Clark and Emma Ainsley of CMS discuss the judgment handed down by the UK Supreme Court on 15 July 2020 in a referral from the High Court of Justiciary, the Scottish criminal appeal court, in the matter of Sutherland v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2020] UKSC 32 concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained by so-called “paedophile hunter” groups in criminal trials. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by MATHEW PURCHASE
Lord Clarke took the view that, in some circumstances, it would be appropriate to require the passenger to disembark: paragraphs 158-159. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Clark v Manchester City Council [2015] UKUT 129 (LC) Mr Clark had a licence for an HMO for not more than 5 occupants. [read post]
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
 Clarke (O.N.C.A., Jan. 11, 2013) (35487) Being charged after the Truth in Sentencing Act came into effect means the Act applies. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
. _____________________________________ 2 Théberge v Galerie d’Art du Petit Champlain Inc, 2002 SCC 34 at para 30. 3 CCH Canadian v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13 at para 16 [CCH]. 4 King Features Syndicate Inc v O and M Kleeman Ltd, [1941] AC 417 HL; Hawkes & Son (Lon- don) Ltd v Paramount Film Service Ltd, [1934] 1 Ch 593 [Hawkes & Son]. 5 We note in passing that choreography is similarly a performance-based media, realized through… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
The hearing took place on 29 and 31 October before Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Toulsen. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
Evans b*tch *ss boyfriend [this is referring to defendant Gygatz] too He a p*ssy *ss n*gg* tryna talk sh*t while walking away’   Rosario v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 1:25 pm
Clark, 491 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and company safety standards (Steinberg v. [read post]