Search for: "Clayton by Clayton v. Place"
Results 1 - 20
of 377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC alleges that the execution of the parties’ merger agreement was, and the proposed acquisition would be, an “unfair method of competition” in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act and that the effect of the proposed acquisition “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly” in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:09 pm
See Pate v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ AMA v FTC case from 1980). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Clayton County, 140 S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm
But this ignores why laws such as S.B. 615 are being passed in the first place. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Clayton Cnty., 140 S. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
This policy is part of an FTC “stealth tax” that places additional costs and investigatory risk on mergers that would otherwise be legal and would not require government approval. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Most importantly it places her case in a history of LGBTQ rights litigation, including Watkins v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Clayton County. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Uddin v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:18 am
" Saxe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
I’ll avoid starting with the history of antitrust law in general because I think the right place to start here is we have a law in the United States, the Clayton Act, that specifically regulates mergers. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
”[6] Partial Ownership and Section 7 Nothing in section 7 of the Clayton Act limits antitrust scrutiny to transactions of controlling interests. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:31 am
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm
From Westenbroek v. [read post]
