Search for: "Coast Community College District v. Commission on State Mandates" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
While Senate lobbied for private sector clients, the commission did not pay it for lobbying, only for communications and media training. [read post]
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, which held that the federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (“ICCTA”) does not preempt CEQA for a new railroad project, and that the State of California, as the railroad operator, could opt to subject itself to CEQA review without conflicting with the ICCTA. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 596. [read post]