Search for: "Cobbs v. Grant"
Results 1 - 20
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2024, 7:15 am
The district court (Cobb, J.) granted summary judgment for Kalshi earlier this month on the ground that the contracts do not involve unlawful activity or gaming. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:28 am
The Court of Appeals granted review of the choice of law issue and the question of whether the trial court properly applied the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Auld v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:38 am
In re Cobb, 2022 VT 55 (mem.) [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 6:33 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 pm
Cobb, 2022-NCSC-57, ___ N.C. ___ (May 6, 2022). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:11 am
But it was most fully articulated in Canterbury and later that year in Cobbs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
Last week HHJ Dancey published a second judgment in a case involving allegations of rape and domestic abuse including coercive and controlling behaviour (the judgment is A Child (Application of PD12J : No.2 – Findings of Fact) [2022] EWFC 2). [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Cobbs. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
Mr Justice Tony O’Connor granted an ex-parte application by Mr Ganley’s lawyers permitting legal papers to be served outside the jurisdiction on CNN. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
Cobb, __ N.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 1:07 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
Claim of malicious prosecution for offense of blocking sidewalk could proceed; grant of summary judgment reversed Salley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
Cobb, __ N.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:47 am
Cobb had not ... [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Cobb-Leavy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Also see prior posts on the CFPB v. [read post]
