Search for: "Collins v. Doe et al" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm by The Collins Law Firm, P.C.
For the last 50 years, EPA has buckled to pressure from the chemical industry, and basically done nothing to protect millions of Americans from breathing a life-threatening, cancer-causing chemical known as “ethylene oxide” (ETO). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm by Jacob Fishman
& Leila Barraza et al., Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (forthcoming 2023) In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of cr [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Malik Al Nasir claims he has been pressed to remove a reference in his work to Antoinette Sandbach. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It thus fails the First Amendment test set forth in Bishop, for reasons discussed in more detail in the Brief of Appellees Novoa et al. at 34-39. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The court held that the “mere making of application [to a costs assessor] does not constitute a step” [21]. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Leaves to Appeal Granted Aboriginal Law: Treaty Rights InterpretationCanada (Attorney General), et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Those provisions govern timing, and they would preclude the worst shenanigans that Trump and his allies in state legislatures attempted following the 2020 election.Bottom Line: The bills on offer from Senators Collins, Manchin, et al are pretty good, and their key provisions are constitutional even assuming the Supreme Court endorses ISL. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently decided this in Parekh et al v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 8:03 am by Christopher J. Willis
  In Collins, the Supreme Court held that an unconstitutional removal restriction does not invalidate agency action so long as the agency head was properly appointed. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]