Search for: "Collins v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
On 25 April 2024, Collins Rice J delivered a decision on damages for the successful claimants in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 956 (KB). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 27 March 2024 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in the case of Trump v Orbis. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 22 March 2024, there was a remedies hearing before Collins Rice J in Blake v Fox QB-2021-001248. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC [2024] EWHC 343 (KB). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins Rice J will hand down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan, heard 22 and 23 January 2024 (Collins Rice J) Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited, heard 19 and 20 December 2023 (Chamberlain J) Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Wilson v Mendelsohn and others, heard 4 to 8 December 2023 (HHJ… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Collins Rice J ruled that a hearing should take place to decide whether the posts were statements of fact or opinion. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 22 and 23 January 2024, Collins Rice J heard the trial of Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan QB-2021-002658. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO 20214-23 Lunn v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach: sanction – publication of correction 20293-23 Mendes v Western Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20606-23 White v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last week. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
 IPSO Resolution Statement – 21032-23 Collins v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16764-23 Loftus, Brame, Shearly-Sanders & McLeod v hadleigh.nub.news, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction  Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last two weeks. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 14 December 2023 there was a set aside application in the case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Broadcaster Alan Jones is planning legal action against Nine newspapers for “demonstrably false” allegations of indecent assault published in the Sydney Morning Herald. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
” Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 In Webb, the Defendant issued an application for an order that the particulars of claim be struck out in [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 712–13 (1997) (Breyer, J., dissenting))) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]