Search for: "Com. v. Huge" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:49 am by J
After all, whether (and to what extent) housing associations are – or should be treated as – public authorities is a huge issue and one that, since R (Weaver) v L&Q [2009] EWCA Civ 58 has been crying out for legislative consideration. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
I had thought out two likely scenarios in my mind: in the first one, the company kicked the can down the road, “investigating” the Raptors and slow walking the plan to address the fraud until it was impossible to ignore; or two, quickly recognize the fraud for what it was, make plans to write off the Raptor structures as prior year restatements (a hugely negative and big deal to investors and Wall Street), form a crisis management team, hoard cash, estimate litigation costs for… [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 2:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
& Taxation of Com. of Mass., 499 F.2d 60, 62 (1st Cir. 1974) (Bank is a “public governmental body” whose “interests seem indistinguishable from those of the sovereign”) Jet Courier Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 10:16 am by Bob Ambrogi
Reach out to me at ambrogi-at-gmail-dot-com or on Twitter to @bobambrogi.] [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Huge dispute elsewhere in ICANN and in TM law over whether geographic indications are “marks,” but resolved in implementation, outside of agreement by participants, in favor of including GIs. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Donald Uderitz and NCSLT bond holders a huge favor by holding that the APR and monthly repayment amount estimates in the original Truth-in-Lending Disclosure Statements are enforceable as contract terms, effectively freezing the interest rates at the level they were at at the time of loan origination before the financial crash.The student loans at issue in Foster v. [read post]