Search for: "Com. v. Miller, D."
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Miller, 510 U. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
State Lands Com. (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 549, 561 (“Citizens”), a decision analyzed in this blog’s 2/9/12 post.) [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
State Lands Com. (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476, 496.) [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
In making those decisions, the com- mittee may consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
In making those decisions, the com- mittee may consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
But see Miller v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
/California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:52 am
California Coastal Com. (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 563, 577, fn. 8; La Costa Beach Homeowners’ Assn. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Solano County Airport Land Use Com. (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 381.) [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit erred under Miller-El v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
Hollywoodians Encouraging Rental Opportunities (HERO) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
Fair Political Practices Com’n (2001) 25 Cal.4th 688, 698-699.) [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
Further, “CEQA forbids ‘piecemeal’ review of the significant environmental impacts of a project” (quoting Berkeley Keep Jets Over The Bay Com. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:09 pm
” (Quoting Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
B256605); The City of Beverly Hills v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
(E.g., Saltonstall v. [read post]