Search for: "Com. v. Young"
Results 1 - 20
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
Similarly, in Allison v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Atari Interactive v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm
Special rate for young scholars under the age of thirty and scholars in developing nations: €150 or €75 for Juris Diversitas members who paid their 2024 dues. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
” [What was in its time a revolution of brave, audacious, creative young people, became with the passage of time, through its modes of institutionalization and its focus on securing the mechanisms of power, into something essentially conservative, transforming itself in the process into a revolutionary gerontocracy reluctant to foster any effective renewal. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Este nuevo convenio logra un respetuoso entendimiento y reafirma nuestros lazos históricos, protegiendo diferentes puntos de interés común para ambas instituciones religiosas, con cuyo hermanamiento, da continuidad a nuestros vínculos anteriormente suscritos y deja indisolublemente ligado a dos cultos con raíces y prácticas muy cercanas con origenes africanos. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm
Special rate for young scholars under the age of thirty and scholars in developing nations: €150 or €75 for Juris Diversitas members who paid their 2024 dues. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Meanwhile in Com. ex rel Weston v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
Com. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:01 am
In R v Suter, the Supreme Court of Canada explained collateral consequences in the context of sentencing as follows: a collateral consequence includes any consequence arising from the commission of an offence, the conviction for an offence, or the sentence imposed for an offence, that impacts the offender. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:44 pm
The "before" exhibits were innocuous stock photographs Boland found online of two young girls, Jane Doe and Jane Roe. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:57 am
Pixels[.]com is a print-on-demand vendor. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:41 am
On June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Bell (1927) Module 7: "Economic" Liberty Through the New Deal O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
I suggested that young dogs might need to learn some old tricks to ensure fair and acceptable outcomes. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
This was further cemented by Young v. [read post]
