Search for: "Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc. (2001)"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 9:21 am
In Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
In that case, Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
In that case, Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
In that case, Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:55 am
Gary Saderup, Inc. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 387 speaks directly to this issue. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
" (Guglielmi v Spelling-Goldberg Productions, 25 Cal 3d 860, 869, 603 P2d 454, 460 [1979] (Bird, C.J., concurring) (concurrence endorsed by four of seven Justices).) [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., 255 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:59 pm
Gary Saderup, Inc., 21 P.3d 797, 803 (2001) [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:44 am
Gary Saderup, Inc. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 387. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Gary Saderup, Inc., 25 Cal. 4th 387, 106 Cal. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:46 am
Gary Saderup, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:28 pm
[I]n Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
These laws can also protect consumers against deception regarding a product’s source. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
For example, the PTO denied registration under Section 1052(c) to ROYAL KATE as applied to watches, cufflinks, jewelry, and other luxury products based solely on the determination that “ROYAL KATE identifies Kate Middleton whose identity is renowned. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
(Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
