Search for: "Comm. v. Small (Dissenting Opinion)" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
(in dissent, but not on this point) recognized the “perversity” of such a position. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
Township of Scott, concluding that a plaintiff alleging that local governments have violated the Takings Clause under the Fifth Amendment may seek relief directly in federal court, as a constitutional violation occurs at the time of the taking without payment, even if just compensation is subsequently paid.[1] In the 5-4 majority opinion, the Court overruled, in part, Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
In a dissenting opinion, Kavanaugh concluded that the law concerning probable cause w [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm by NBlack
The majority wisely explained: “The better analogy to this case is Board of Airport Comm’rs of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm by David Kopel
Comm’r of Revenue (U.S. 1983) (special tax on newspaper ink violates First Amendment). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
I note as well, the dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
         OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT GRANTING IMMUNITY  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS   ════════════ NO. 14-0536 ════════════  JESUS RUBEN MOLINA, PETITIONER, v. [read post]