Search for: "Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 1:03 pm by John Ross
Dissent: Interesting conclusion, but the plaintiffs don't have standing. [read post]
Butte and Plumas counties (“Plaintiffs”) filed separate writ petitions challenging the sufficiency of the EIR. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
  Starting with Item 105, issuers are required to disclose in certain filings any factors that might make the purchase of their securities “speculative” or “risky. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 11:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
  With respect to GHG, the guidelines would require not only the company’s own direct GHG emissions (Scope 1), but indirect emissions from purchased electricity and other forms of energy (Scope 2). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Here, the SEC instituted proceedings against Tilton and her Patriarch Partners firms in March of 2015, alleging that she and her firms hid the poor performance of the companies that she’d invested in. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This month, cyber thieves reportedly broke into a slew of national law firms, including two New York law firms, Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Weil Gotshal and Manges, who represent Fortune 500 companies and financial institutions all over the world. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:08 am by Jonathan Rudnick
The plaintiff instituted suit against the manufacturer and other defendants for tort (negligence) and warranty claims. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Court said “the suggested commercial rationale is objectively reasonable. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Eastern District Court of New York did not delve too deeply into the question of causation, but it did conclude that “Regardless of the precise role played by defendants’ employees, the above-described operation of the Make-A-Tapes clearly evidences their commercial exploitation by defendants for profit in derogation of plaintiffs’ rights of exclusive publication. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
Did Judge Chin err by failing to properly weigh the indirect commercial benefits Google realized by exploiting the works? [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm by admin
  They are without them the best kind of commercial asset the world can have, and must never be depressed or suppressed by the law. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
The CFTC’s June 27, 2012 Order Instituting Proceedings (here) details the allegations against Barclays. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
It would be surprising for the Supreme Court to give leave, to argue liability, if the plaintiffs suffered no compensable damages in any event. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:47 am by randal shaheen
The plaintiffs claimed that they lost business as the result of FNC’s misrepresentations because FNC was able to build a competing electronic database that lending institutions could choose in lieu of purchasing appraisal services from the plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 10:41 am by FDABlog HPM
  As we previously reported, in that case the district court largely dismissed multidistrict litigation brought by the FTC, direct purchasers, and indirect purchasers challenging certain agreements in which Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. allegedly paid generic drug companies to delay generic competition to Solvay’s drug product ANDROGEL (testosterone gel). [read post]