Search for: "Commonwealth v. Cost, H. - No. (Granted)" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
Hübner: Climate change litigation at the interface of private and public law – the foreign permit The article deals with the interplay of private international law, substantive law, and public law in the realm of international environmental liability. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
.: Brookings Institution Senior Fellow Michael O’Hanlon will engage Rebecca Grant, president of IRIS Independence Research, and Tom Ehrhard, vice president at the Long Term Strategy Group, in a conversation on Air Force modernization and budget priorities. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
An extension may be requested, but our understanding is that IRS internal policy is to grant just one 30-day extension per letter. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Speakers will include Secretary of the Army Mark Esper, Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and moderator Kathleen H. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
The event will feature a panel of CSIS experts Todd Harrison, Kathleen H. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
(The El-Moslimanys' homeowner's insurance carrier was found not to have either a duty to defend or a duty to indemnify in this case, but it did cover the defense costs until that decision. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Sept. 9, Dowling, J.).Whether other trial court judges from around the commonwealth will rule in a similar fashion or will, instead, apply the same rule of discovery pertaining to video surveillance remains to be seen.Claims of Privileged Information in DiscoveryIn its decision in the case Brown v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Moreover, because Section 636(a) expressly incorporates any authorities granted to magistrate judges by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, . . . the Court's analyses of whether the NIT Warrant was statutorily permissible and whether it was allowed under Rule 41(b) are necessarily intertwined.U.S. v. [read post]