Search for: "Commonwealth v. Gill" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:25 am by Gail Whittemore
Challenges to legislative districting maps have also been filed in Wisconsin (Gill v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Hayley Evans
To that end, practices like those espoused in Pentagon policy, requiring autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons systems to undergo “rigorous hardware and software verification and validation (V&V) and realistic system developmental and operational test and evaluation (T&E),” can help reduce the risk of unintended combat engagements. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, some folks are hoping that the Court (in particular Justice Kennedy) will find a way in the Wisconsin districting case argued in October—Gill v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:49 am by NCC Staff
At the same time, there is a similar case about Pennsylvania redistricting in the federal court system, and the United States Supreme Court is considering a possible landmark gerrymandering decision from Wisconsin in Gill v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Whether it can do so is a key issue in the current case, Gill v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The test of “outrageous” conduct is, by the way, derived from the Commonwealth and US case law (see the Law Commission Report, para 5.46). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm by Ben Cheng
The petitions of the day are: Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:21 pm by Ben Cheng
The petition of the day is: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Ben Cheng
MassachusettsDocket: 12-15Issue(s): Whether Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. 7, violates the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws as applied to persons of the same sex who are legally married under the laws of their state.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariResponse of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in support of certiorariResponse of Nancy Gill et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It has been docketed as 12-97, Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:08 pm by Betsy McKenzie
The First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled yesterday in two cases, Gill v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 10-2204  (1st Cir. 5/13/12), aff’g Gill v. [read post]