Search for: "Commonwealth v. Taylor, T. - No. (Granted)" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:52 pm by Samantha Maddern and Patrick Williams
Notwithstanding Fitzgerald, the FWC has still shown a willingness to grant permission where the circumstances warrant it, including in Stringfellow v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation[8] and Monteiro v Valco Group Australia Pty Ltd[9] which both involved complex issues and, in Monteiro, the fact that the company was largely French-based and the applicant was its only Australian-based manager. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Supreme Court of Canada has granted permission to appeal in the case of Goldhar v. haaretz.com, which will address key issues of jurisdiction in online defamation cases. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
  Before proceeding any further, DeShay contacted Detective Taylor in the Treasure Islandpolice drug division and informed him of the situation, but Taylor declined to join them at the scene. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Taylor, 256 Va. 514, 506 S.E.2d 312 (Virginia Supreme Court 1998). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  James Eadie says core problem is that you wouldn’t actually be arguing about legality of ongoing detention. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” There’s a certain attraction to an absolutist First Amendment: “No law” means no law.1 But that position is not very helpful, since the Amendment doesn’t define “freedom of speech” or freedom of the press. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm by Bexis
I n the chief Pennsylvania case it cites, Taylor v. [read post]