Search for: "Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc. v. King" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Kings Park Manor, Inc., for instance, the Second Circuit sitting en banc refused to hold a landlord liable for its tenants' racial harassment of fellow tenants, partly because of concern that such responsibility would pressure landlords to exercise undue power over tenants: [Under the alternative proposed by Francis,] prospective and current renters would confront more restrictive leases rife with in terrorem clauses, intensified tenant screening procedures, and… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
Australia’s ‘traditional’ media companies—those that produce newspapers and television—are having a hard time. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear that tax exemptions can't be denied based on the viewpoint that a group communicates. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Gorsuch with opinion in Virginia Uranium Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The holding of Claiborne is thus consistent with the principle set forth just six years before in Runyon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
” In Canada, Southin J. in the British Columbia Supreme Court noted in 1986 that “the proclamation of the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms] by a process worthy of an alchemist, has transformed judges from lawyers into philosopher kings…”[21] In light of these views, one might expect that the explicit mention of philosophers would occur most frequently in the context of constitutional law. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am by Barry Sookman
Del. 2007) (dismissing claim alleging that Google’s PageRank search results algorithm ranked the plaintiff’s webpage unfairly); Search King Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Other actions: * Grattan v Porter – $170,000 after the defendant telephoned a school alleging sexual misconduct, Queensland. * Dr Janice Duffy v Google Inc – $100,000 following search results and hyperlinks suggesting she was a “psychic stalker”, SA. * Douglas v McLernon – $700,000 to three Perth businessmen defamed on the internet, WA. * Dodds v McDonald – a Queensland barrister’s website accused the Victorian… [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 17 March 2017 judgment was handed down in the case of Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers heard 11 November 2016 (HHJ Parkes QC). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]