Search for: "Condon v. Industrial Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Toronto Transit Commission v Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113, 2020 CanLII 71739 (ON LA) Most importantly, the facts do not disclose condonation. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:19 am by Florian Mueller
Daimler brought its EU antitrust complaint against Nokia in 2018, and the Euporean Commission is still dragging its feet while another court decision (Nokia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
The math just doesn't work for the case against the case against Nokia: on the bottom license, Europe has far more to gain from enforcing settled competition law (in Huawei v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm by Sam Eichner
On January 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
A recent note discusses the decision of the Supreme Court in Kandimalla Raghavaiah v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
  The Court said that the FTC has never required the tobacco industry to disclose tar and nicotine yields from the test, and has not condoned depictions of those results by using the word “light” or the phrase “low tar and nioctine” in marketing and advertising. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Much of the discussion is centering on the impact of the 2005 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Clean Up the Internet has an article condoning Ofcom’s further delay to take action on user verification and promote the implementation of tools for UK users to spot and avoid fake and anonymous accounts. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:14 am by Beth Van Schaack
For example, in support of his conclusion in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
  It has joined with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in supporting complementary rulemaking regarding “Made in USA” product labelling. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]