Search for: "Consolidated Truck Service v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
At minimum, the implementation of all provisional measures should be a condition before the United States, or any country, considers further military or diplomatic support of Israel. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
Applicable financial statement income is generally the net income reported on a corporation’s “applicable financial statement,” subject to various adjustments, such as to account for differences in tax and financial statement consolidation, to adjust for differences between tax and financial statement depreciation, and to allow for financial statement loss carryovers incurred for taxable years ending after December 31, 2019 up to 80 percent of adjusted financial statement… [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm by Matt Murphy
The United States Department of Transportation estimates that human error accounted for 94% of these crashes. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
A property owner sought a demolition permit (for an existing dilapidated home) and design approval for an eight-unit multi-family building. [read post]
Both Sierra Club and Golden Door Properties, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandate and an injunction, and the cases were consolidated. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
FMCSA considering loosening hours-of-service restrictions for commercial truck drivers. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Supreme Court held that an auto dealership’s service advisors are exempt under FLSA, Section 213(b)(10)(A), which applies to “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles, trucks, or farm implements. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Meanwhile, a new poll finds that Americans’ perceptions of the United States’ fight against the Islamic State are becoming more positive. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]