Search for: "Consolidation Coal Company v."
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Hallmark & Son Coal Co., 935 F. 2d 336, 342 (D.C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:05 pm
Kagan, writing for all the justices except Justice Neil Gorsuch, treats the case as a straightforward application of a framework established in the court’s 1994 decision in Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
Moreover, if the Supreme Court decides Türkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Exceptions may apply, including for stock repurchases: occurring in connection with certain non-taxable corporate reorganizations; by regulated investment companies and real estate investment trusts; not exceeding $1 million in aggregate during the taxable year; and to the extent treated as a dividend. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
It also had two pump stations to supply its own water and a coal-fired engine plant to generate its own electricity. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am
The secretary of state can direct airport operators to detain Russian aircraft in U.K. airspace and the CAA may refuse, suspend or revoke permissions for Russian aircraft; and[v] Luxury goods: Other measures include a ban on the export of high-end luxury goods to Russia and higher import tariffs on key Russian goods. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm
Moreover, they add, in its 2011 decision in American Electric Power v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:23 pm
It is consolidated with North American Coal Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
It is consolidated with North American Coal Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
Pix Credit HERE It is only appropriate that, as China's leading societal forces celebrate the 100th anniversary of its organization as the Communist Party of China, that this vanguard consider carefully its own progress and the way it meets its responsibilities as the leading force charged with the guidance of the Chinese nation toward the establishment of a communist society. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am
Republicans offered amendments to all three bills that would have provided that a public company need not make a disclosure unless the thing to be disclosed met the materiality standard expressed by the Supreme Court in TSC Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 10:31 am
US v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
See Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
GDP.[5] Opponents of the PJM MOPR argue that there are a number of federal benefits for oil and gas producers, including, but not limited to (i) the intangible drilling costs deduction, which allows companies to deduct from taxable income costs incurred from domestic drilling of wells,[6] and (ii) last-in, first-out accounting, which allows fossil fuel companies to reflect lower inventory for purposes of calculating taxable income.[7] Some coal-fired resources… [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
McCarthy, in 2014, he wrote a panel decision upholding an EPA program aimed at addressing the environmental effects on waterways of mountaintop-removal coal mining. [read post]
