Search for: "Cook v. No Named Defendant" Results 1 - 20 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm by The Collins Law Firm, P.C.
  Because, while the story above may be nominally about ETO, the names of many other similarly toxic chemicals could be substituted for ETO, and the story would not change much. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
To opine on the subject would be to “disregard the constitutional duties that are the specific responsibility of other branches of government,” namely, Congress and the president. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
People who bake know what they want to cook with, but they might be in a rush and get the wrong one. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  Trump’s “I did not engage in insurrection” assertion, in turn, consists of two distinct arguments—namely, (i) that Trump did not incite the violence at the Capitol because he did not intend his followers to use violence; and (ii) that, in any event, incitement to insurrection doesn’t qualify as “engaging in” insurrection, because Section 3 does not establish “vicarious liability. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:00 am by Aaron Moss
You may then be wondering why I’m even including Griffin v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 7:44 am by Russell Knight
It has sought to protect its own good name as well as to protect defendants …against the practice of seeking out soft spots in the judicial system in which to bring particular kinds of litigation. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down by Master Cook in Muhammad v Daily The News International & Ors (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 674 (KB). [read post]