Search for: "Corpus v. Estelle"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 11:47 am
"We have repeatedly held that 'federal habeas corpus relief does not lie for errors of state law,'" the Court said, citing its 1991 decision in Estelle v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:04 am
Martin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm
"We have stated many times that 'federal habeas corpus relief does not lie for errors of state law.'" Swarthout, at 4 (quoting Estelle v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Jackson, Angelica Estell Hernandez, Craig S. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Estelle, 455 U.S. 288, 304 (1980); Coker v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 2:06 am
.'" Estelle v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Estelle; and (3) whether the denial of a certificate of appealability on petitioner’s Batson claim conflicts with Miller-El. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893, 103 S. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
Although it was held in Byrne v Minister for Finance that article 35.5 does not prevent the imposition of a generally applicable income tax on judicial salaries, the previous Government concluded, in 2009, that it precluded the imposition on judges not only of the public sector pay cuts, but also, the pension levy. [read post]
