Search for: "Cotton v. Mississippi" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The idea that investors might choose to consider certain environmental, social, and governance factors when deciding whether to buy shares of a company—a concept commonly known as ESG—continues to gain popularity with trillions of dollars currently held in investment funds that take into account ESG principles. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
By mechanically separating the cotton fiber from the sticky seeds, which formerly had to be done by hand, the plantation farming of cotton using slave labor became enormously profitable. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Jennifer Davis
Murder in Mississippi : United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Department of Agriculture (USDA) data on agricultural productivity by county, for key row crops like corn, cotton, hay, and soybeans. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am by Jeffery Robinson
Less than 170 years later, the enslaved population had grown to about 700,000 humans, and America was producing 1.5 million pounds of cotton a year.On the eve of the Civil War, America’s cotton production had grown to 2.3 billion pounds a year. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am by J. Gordon Hylton
In 1943 and 1944, he was an instructor in aeriel navigation and physical education for Naval Officers enrolled at UVA under the V-12 program. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:57 am by Alfred Brophy
Founding members of the first council chapter included “a planter, a farmer, a dentist, the mayor, a lawyer, a [cotton] ginner, [and] a druggist and hardware dealer. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
Stephens, 13-7211 (granted at the March 21 Conference, relisted once); Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]