Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 227,302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 8:13 am
” Background The case, Christine Savage v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am
(Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:51 am
In the 2012 United States Supreme Court case National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
United StatesLindke v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:06 am
The ICJ CERD Cases Two cases brought under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), Armenia v Azerbaijan and Azerbaijan v Armenia, are relevant, both of which center on Nagorno-Karabakh. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am
On May 20, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) filed applications for arrest warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:15 am
The Supreme Court's erroneous decision in Trump v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:30 am
On May 9, 2024, in the matter of Jason Kim v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Little v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:00 am
In San Jose Korean Central Church v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:32 am
Marumo v Member of the Executive Council for Health: Free State Province (24/2015) [2024] ZAFSHC 66 [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On May 23, 2024, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 8:48 pm
The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in NRA v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:36 pm
The Supreme Court decided Thursday that government officials cannot indirectly suppress free speech through coercion, reinforcing their previous decision in Bantam Books, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 pm
/Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm
” It contends that the court “ignored binding precedent; misapplied an equitable doctrine as a rigid, strict liability standard; and explicitly stated that equities do not matter. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:49 pm
The authors compare the court’s approach with that of courts in Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] My Identifying Would-Be Jane Doe Litigant in Law Review Article Wasn't "Harassment,"
30 May 2024, 12:55 pm
From Luo v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:55 pm
Cher v. [read post]