Search for: "Cox v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval… [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
She cites ElliottEstate v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am by INFORRM
The first part of his statement was seized on by right-leaning commentators, in the USA and abroad; the second part was derided and dismissed. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
In Section 540F of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Congress directed the Department of Defense to conduct a feasibility study, and to report the findings of that study, on a potential new “alternative military justice system. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
(Cox Communications and Aruba have made similar requests i [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 1:54 am by Ben
The fallout from the BMG v Cox case in the USA continues, with a court denying ISP Grande Communications the benefit of safe harbour protection in a case brought by the Recording Industry Association Of America (RIAA). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]