Search for: "Cox v. City of Jackson" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1941, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in Cox v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
In Part I of this series, I concluded that the “president cannot obstruct justice when he exercises his lawful authority that is vested by Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: SRJ v Persons Unknown 11 June 2014 (Sir David Eady) Stocker v Stocker, heard 16 June 2014 (HHJ Parkes QC) Tardios v Linton, heard 17 June 2014 (HHJ Parkes QC) PNM v Times Newspapers, heard 18 June 2014 (Master of the Rolls, Jackson and Vos LJJ). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25)… [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
., will pay the civil penalty under terms of an administrative consent agreement filed today by EPA Region 7 in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
., will pay the civil penalty under terms of an administrative consent agreement filed today by EPA Region 7 in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Paul Mollica calls this a genuine head-scratcher] Cox v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
The Board, in agreeing with the judge that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by terminating employee Christina Cox, found it unnecessary to pass on the judge's finding that the discharge also violated Section 8(a)(3), inasmuch as the additional finding would be cumulative and would not materially affect the remedy for the discharge. [read post]