Search for: "Cox v. Department of Revenue"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
State Department. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:20 pm
"] From Judge Madeline Cox Arleo (D.N.J.), writing today in Pacira Biosciences, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
That restriction to the statutory usage of "other legal process" is important here, for in the abstract the department does use legal process as the avenue to reimbursement: by a federal legal process the Commissioner appoints the department a representative payee, and by a state legal process the department makes claims against the accounts kept by the state treasurer. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
According to Cox, OCR’s interpretation of the Patient Rate rule as applicable to third party requests as well as direct patient requests cost it and other medical records companies millions of dollars in revenue. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
According to the Internal Revenue Service, for those who received a refund this year that refund averaged to about $3,000 per person. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am
Uncertainty makes it v. difficult for nonprofits to provide a robust environment that we all depend on. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Last week, the Court granted cert in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Last week, the Court granted cert in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am
” In Herman v Franke, Gottsegen, Cox Architects 2017 NY Slip Op 07980 Decided on November 15, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department one side utilized an expert, the other did not. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
An email to the Department of Revenue seeking comment on the lawsuit was not immediately returned. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
