Search for: "Cox v. First Provident Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Joining us tonight is Kate Cox, a wife and mother from Dallas. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
We believe that the first action that sought books and records to plead around a Corwin defense was Elizabeth Morrison v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
The facts in Florida Star provide a vivid example of the dangerous consequences that disclosing a victim's name may possibly have. [read post]
Our comments proceed as follows: First, we describe the history of SEC rules in this area, explaining that the SEC has long mandated public-company disclosure of environmental-related matters. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Christopher Cox in a letter dated Aug. 13, 1999, that the Defense Department would comply (though he also cautioned that such a requirement might be inconsistent with existing law regarding civil liberties protections for U.S. persons). [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
” The problem presented to the Court of Chancery was whether the sale of an interest triggered either a right of first refusal and/or a right of first offer, and if both applied, which was to be given priority. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Specific holdings: Under the DMCA, a lower grandfathered royalty rate is paid by some music services that were early providers of digital music transmissions. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
First, Paradis does not note the massive changes to the convening authority’s posttrial review power now encoded in Article 60a of the UCMJ. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" "'[T]here is no categorical "harassment exception" to the First Amendment's free speech clause.'" State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
” In their decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
” Because this involves an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion to dismiss, the cases raise the question whether this is one of the categories of interlocutory orders the Supreme Court has recognized to be “final decisions” subject to immediate review under Cox Broadcasting Corp v. [read post]