Search for: "Craighead v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:20 am
” (See Snyder v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:41 am
Exch. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
Dicta in RM (AP) (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) (Scotland) (SC(Sc) [2012] 1 WLR 3386, [2012] UKSC 58 (which considered Regina v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
Decision The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with Lord Hope of Craighead giving the leading judgment. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm
Barbato, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41034), Craighead v. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
Airways v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:44 am
Lord Hope of Craighead provided such a definition in Campbell v MGN. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The Scottish Legal Aid Board Criminal Legal Assistance Handbook, Part III ABWOR - Summary Criminal Proceedings, paragraph 3.19, states that the case disposal fee is currently £515 with add-ons payable in some cases bringing these payments into line with the financial limit of £550. [7] Miss Law informed me that in this case the solicitor was entitled to £485 but because there were three adjourned diets the total maximum fee was £535. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The Scottish Legal Aid Board Criminal Legal Assistance Handbook, Part III ABWOR - Summary Criminal Proceedings, paragraph 3.19, states that the case disposal fee is currently £515 with add-ons payable in some cases bringing these payments into line with the financial limit of £550. [7] Miss Law informed me that in this case the solicitor was entitled to £485 but because there were three adjourned diets the total maximum fee was £535. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am
R(on the application of S and KF) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 1810 (Admin)- read judgment This case about prisoner’s pay provides an interesting up to date analysis of the role of the doctrine of “margin of appreciation” and its applicability in domestic courts. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
As you may recall, in its complaint for copyright infringement, HarperCollins argued that its contract for Julie of the Wolves, a book first published in 1972, gave it the sole right to publish Jean Craighead George’s YA classic in eBook form. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
As you may recall, in its complaint for copyright infringement, HarperCollins argued that its contract for Julie of the Wolves, a book first published in 1972, gave it the sole right to publish Jean Craighead George’s YA classic in eBook form. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
As you may recall, in its complaint for copyright infringement, HarperCollins argued that its contract for Julie of the Wolves, a book first published in 1972, gave it the sole right to publish Jean Craighead George’s YA classic in eBook form. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Lord Hope of Craighead, in turn, granted a highly unusual interview to The Times rejecting these criticisms (‘Salmond has got it all wrong, says judge – First Minister “misunderstood the law and the facts”’, 27 May 2011). [read post]
