Search for: "Customers Parking v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The Daily Mail had a piece on the recent judgment in Parsons v Atkinson [2024] EWHC 888 (KB) under the headline “Millionaire author loses poison pen letter libel case against his primary school friend in bitter legal battle that has divided sleepy Lake District town”. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Last week in the courts On 4 April 2023, judgement on costs was handed down by Justice Murray in the case of Parkes v Hall and Earnshaw [2023] EWHC 794 (KB). [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:38 am
The District of Columbia has expanded its employment discrimination protections to cover independent contractors. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
(I will note that even the hallowed grounds of pitching mounds in major league baseball parks are now stamped with corporate logos.) [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
User data included customers’ addresses, phone numbers and IP addresses, and it is unknown how many times the data was provided, Bloomberg reports. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
Bruen, the Court may consider whether to elaborate on its statement in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia use ad valorem taxes; only seven states assess a flat surcharge; and two states levy both an ad valorem tax and a flat-dollar surcharge. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unlawful. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:42 pm
SEC, June 26, 2020, Park, M.). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
The Court ruled that the Park was a public forum and that the rules which prohibited free speech and petitions in the Park violated the right to free speech under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.GeorgiaKatamadze v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am
That requirement was inserted into the Exemption 4 equation via a 1974 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the case of National Parks & Conservation Assn v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
The defendant admitted early in the lawsuit that it needed to remediate its parking and made a Rule 68 offer of judgment that proposed an injunction to fix the parking and the maximum damages available under state law. [read post]
