Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm
C. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:33 am
Otherwise, the proposal is considered a general tax and may pass with simple majority approval. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:40 am
By Matthew D. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:30 pm
Here, Troy D. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:49 pm
Like its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 612 indicates that Except as otherwise provided in criminal proceedings by Rules 16(B)(1)(g) and 16(C)(1)(d) of Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure, if a witness uses a writing to refresh memory for the... [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
§1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), a taxpayer must serve a public interest rather than a private interest. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:40 am
M v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and another (Case C-277/11); [2012] WLR (D) 359 “The co-operation requirement in the second sentence of article 4(1) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, did not require a… [read post]
17 May 2021, 5:33 am
Final thoughtsThe decision of the Court of Appeal of Ireland in Merck v Clonmel [2021] IECA 54 provides an important nuance to the interpretation of the Article 3(d) SPC Regulation following Santen (C-673/18). [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Pix Credit hereGroovin' slow and easy, just takin' our timeWe ain't goin' nowhere, for baby I don't mindSo put your arms around mewe're gonna take a journey down to rhythm and bluesRidin' on a soul train, yeah baby just-a me and you (lyrics Soultrain, here)This post considers, quite briefly, reflections on several points that may weigh significantly on the way in which one approaches the inevitable and now unstoppable trend toward AI regulation production, and its… [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:54 pm
It is divided into the following books: (a) Book I – sovereignty and general provisions; (b) Book II – the distribution of powers of government; (c) Book III- the Office of the President; (d) Book IV – the executive branch of government; (e) Book V – the Constitutional Commissions; (f) Book VI – national government budgeting; and (g) Book VII – administrative procedure. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Bill C-7 repeals that criterion. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am
(D) The spine. [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
” Katsas uses the example that in, “A, B, C, or otherwise D,” “[i]f the boundaries of ‘D’ were readily ascertainable without clarification, a speaker would simply say ‘D,’ rather than using a longer and clunkier formulation with examples and a residual ‘otherwise’ clause. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm
, which might be taken as a reminiscent of a light form of the principle of systemic integration, Art. 31 (3) (c) VCLT. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:09 am
McKillip Indus., Inc. d/b/a USA/Docufinish, No. 06 C 2071 (N.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:15 am
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys, No. 09 C. 6722, Slip Op. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:42 am
Donald C. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:35 am
” Specifically, CAA § 301(d)(1)(A) provides that EPA “is authorized to treat Indian tribes as states under this chapter” and § 301(d)(2) asserts that EPA “shall promulgate regulations … specifying those provisions for which it is appropriate to treat Indian tribes as States,” under the conditions enumerated in § 301(d)(2)(A)-(C) (emphases added). [read post]
