Search for: "D. et al v. United Healthcare et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Employees in Virginia’s Augusta County thought they’d found a neat trick for foiling Virginia's Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
Genomic Health, Inc., et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Smart Pharmacy, Inc., et al., No. 16-cv-387 (M.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:23 am
Manahe et al., No. 2:22-cr-00013 (D. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
[6] See Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
Circuit Court of Appeals decision in UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
Healthcare Antitrust Concerns On June 3, 2022, Andrew J. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
The Tax Foundation respectfully submits comment on the state tax and revenue implications of the proposed tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
In recent years, Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) and various state audit organizations have expanded their enforcement efforts. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am
That decision is First Solar, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
She came to this country as a teenage refugee from Vietnam and later served in the United States Army. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
Co., et al., 19-cv-10580, (D. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
MARIA SOLEDAD LARRAIN TRONCOSO, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
