Search for: "D.J. v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 6:40 am
The trial court granted summary judgment on this claim in favor of the State, but the Court of Appeals brings the case back, and unless the case settles, it looks like this case will proceed to trial.The case is Brandon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
Va. 1868) (Chase, C.J. and Underwood, D.J.). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The Court finds the plaintiff may proceed with his case even through his Article 78 was not successful.The case is Whitfield v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
The defendant loses the habeas petition.The case is Wilson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:27 am
This case involves the interpretation of a little-known federal statute intended to protect public artistic endeavors.The case is Kerson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:25 am
In 2012, the Court of Appeals said in McElwee v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:48 am
" The plaintiffs sued under the First Amendment, claiming this memo was retaliatory.The case is Bennett v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:22 am
In D.J. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:24 am
In the March 16, 2022 opinion in Jacobs v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:24 am
" In a prior case, Costabile v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:03 am
In Hoover v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 4:56 pm
Regan (Clean Water Act; Navigable Waters Protection Rule) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html In the Matter of D.J. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:52 am
The plaintiff organization (CTPU) sued the State of Connecticut over the state's standards regarding the racial composition of its interdistrict magnet schools. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:03 am
The Second Circuit (Lynch, Bianco and Halpern [D.J.]) notes that plaintiff has abandoned any claim that defendant prevented him from participating in the state court hearing. [read post]
12 May 2021, 1:16 pm
The case is TW v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:22 am
Parada v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 5:54 am
And, there is no prejudice to the state in this case as a result of plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's rules, as the delay did not increase the likelihood that evidence favorable to the state in this case would have been lost because of the delay. [read post]
