Search for: "DMCA Subpoena to Twitter, Inc."
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm
A recent District Court decision in In re DMCA 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc. is a great win for free speech. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:16 am
(In re DMCA § 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc., No. 20-80214 (N.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:17 am
Case citation: In re DMCA § 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc., 2022 WL 2205476 (N.D. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:06 am
Case Citation: In re: DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to YOUTUBE (GOOGLE, INC.), 2022 WL 160270 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 8:14 am
Case citation: In re DMCA § 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc., 2021 WL 6135300 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 8:37 am
Takeshobo did not specify which pirate site they were referring to but the DMCA subpoenas filed in the United States point to one of three domains. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
DMCA subpoenas are a rarely-used part of the law that allow creators to seek identifying information about suspected infringers. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm
In re DMCA Subpoena to eBay, Inc., 2015 WL 3555270 (S.D. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:49 am
The case, Flava Works, Inc v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
However, DMCA is being leveraged by Facebook to claim additional control—Power Ventures case that FB may have copyright in its layout of user’s page. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
SAP America, Inc., et. al. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:03 am
Perfect 10 also sued 100 “doe” defendants and Livewire Services Inc., a company that resells Giganews content. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:11 am
- US court says no in Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
