Search for: "DOE Corporations 1-10" Results 1 - 20 of 7,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Critics argue that these amendments would give Boards the ability to transfer broader powers than those typically involved in settling proxy contests—potentially gutting the protections that shareholders expect when they invest in a Delaware corporation and functionally permitting corporations to de facto o [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Critics argue that these amendments would give Boards the ability to transfer broader powers than those typically involved in settling proxy contests—potentially gutting the protections that shareholders expect when they invest in a Delaware corporation and functionally permitting corporations to de facto o [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
—a bit similar to Nigeria in terms of federalism—does not do that either. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The dedicated staff of this agency does extraordinary work with limited resources. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
Option #1: Employment-Based First Preference Category, EB-1A Aliens of Extraordinary Ability The first immigrant visa classification we will discuss is the EB-1A visa. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:39 am by Andrew Delaney
 Navistar International Corporation, 2024 VT 33. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:42 am by Ariel Feldman
Section 316.189(1) permits setting a maximum speed of 20 or 25 miles per hour within a city, provided an investigation supports the need for such limits. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:31 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Kefalas alleged that he contributed $1 million in exchange for “40% of the profits. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
That’s what I’d like to do this afternoon – speak to you all directly about a topic that has been widely discussed at events like this one, including by me,[1] and that is cooperation. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 7:48 am by David Adelstein
Constructors, Inc., 91-1 BCA P 23351, EBCA No. 328-10-84 (EBCA 1990), the Board maintained: Since 1968, when the Changes clause was amended to include the above phrase “whether or not changed by any order”, boards have experienced an increasing number of claims of cost “impact” on unchanged work, which allegedly was not priced and settled as a cost of performing the changed work. [read post]